Jane (Susan Saint James), Louise (Jessica Lange), and Elaine (Jane Curtin) have money problems. They also have men problems, but the two are unfortunately interconnected. Elaine's husband took off with a 19-year-old, leaving her with a house and (all the attendant bills), but no cash (he cleaned out their bank accounts and stole all her jewelry from the safe-deposit box.) Louise keeps getting "loans" from her veterinarian husband to keep her antique store afloat, but the IRS has gotten suspicious of multiple years of interest-free loans and Albert's in deep financial shit if he doesn't sue her. The child support from Jane's loser ex can't cover raising two kids, and her current boyfriend just keeps talking about how he needs $25,000 so he can buy the hardware store he works at.
More accurately, he needs $24,943, because he's got $57 in the bank. Almost there!
Frustrated and hemmed in by this lack of cash, Elaine hits on the idea of stealing all the money brought in during the big anniversary sales event at the local mall. So the remainder of the film is the run-up to the heist, both the planning and execution, and all the complications that arise from the 3 of them being broke.
The movie leverages certain things it sets up with regards to the guys in their lives. Elaine's husband is an architect, and just so happened to design the mall. Which means she finds the point of entry in his blueprints. Jane's boyfriend works at the hardware store they rob for equipment, because Jane can just sneak the key out of his pants after they finish making out.
Louise? Her husband being a vet doesn't really factor in, but her situation seems different from Elaine or Jane's to an extent where it doesn't entirely feel like she fits. The other two, the guys in their lives either just took the money and ran (Elaine), or are full of excuses for why they can't help (Jane.) Albert has, according to the IRS, given Louise over $36,000 in "loans" (whether he calls it a loan or a gift depends on whether he's talking to the IRS or Louise, though Louise insists they're loans) to keep her business afloat. It is clearly not a viable business, but rather than change her approach, or try something else if she wants independence, she just keeps asking for money she insists she'll pay back.
It isn't great his solution is to sue her and have her declare bankruptcy to settle the whole thing, but if he wasn't giving her money for who knows how long, she'd have declared bankruptcy already.
That aside, I laughed more than I expected. The movie portrays all three women as long on grit, but maybe a little short on skill and trying to learn fast. Elaine's idea that they need to prove they're psychologically capable of a robbery, with Jane trying to stick up the grocery store, was pretty funny. I thought the follow-up heist of a canoe was just them setting their sights lower. "OK, robbing a grocery store failed. Let's see if you can steal a canoe that's only guarded by one bored guy in a clapboard shack." But no! The canoe is actually integral to the heist.
There's a funny bit when they rob the hardware store, where things are going smoothly until Jane can't control her Mom instincts, and another when they're planning the heist during one of Jane's kids' baseball games, and they casually tack on the cost of dental bills for Jane's ex after her dad punches him out for arguing calls, then go back to making plans. It feels like Elaine and Louise are the driving forces - maybe because they don't have any kids that will lose a mom if they get arrested - but a fair amount of the humor is around Jane maybe not being in the right mindset for all this. She's going to do it, but she's got a lot of other stuff on her mind, where the other two are more locked in.











